Supported
The parts of the claim the supplied records support.
SYNTHETIC CASESUPPORTED REVIEW LIMITS
The Garcia File: one synthetic claim, one reviewable result.
This walkthrough shows what people see in a review and the evidence they receive. Detailed technical materials go only to qualified evaluators, with confidentiality terms and legal review in place.
The question
Do the records support the claim as submitted?
WardTrace compares the claim with the supporting records it was given. It identifies specific disagreements for review. It does not declare that fraud occurred and it does not automatically deny a claim.
The Garcia example
A claim that needs a closer look
Mrs. Garcia is a synthetic patient in a remote-monitoring example. Her file has an order and consent. The supplied device evidence does not agree. WardTrace shows the finding and its evidence. A qualified reviewer can then decide what to investigate.
What the reviewer sees
Needs review
A sourced disagreement needs a human decision.
Not established
What the records cannot show is stated, not guessed.
The result
Evidence, not a fraud score.
The reviewer receives the claim summary, the cited disagreements, the method and limitations, and a demonstration integrity receipt. The receipt detects later changes to included synthetic content; it does not authenticate source records, prove an event occurred, or determine legal admissibility.
Claim summaryWhat was reviewed
Cited evidenceWhat needs attention
Known limitsWhat was not established
Verification receiptEvidence of integrity
What this demo does not claim
The case is synthetic. It does not establish performance on production data, fraud, coverage, denial authority, medical necessity, source completeness, or clinical accuracy. Field performance requires a governed calibration pilot on the customer's own data.