Repeatable results
The same supplied records produce the same review findings. Each finding points a reviewer to the evidence that needs attention.
Methodology and validation
WardTrace is tested on synthetic data today. Those results are not field performance. A calibration pilot on the customer's own data is required before field claims are made.
Tested cases
Synthetic test cases let us measure false positives and missed findings during development.
Customer pilot
Production use begins with a governed pilot that measures performance, review burden, and data quality in the customer's environment.
What is shared publicly
We describe how we test WardTrace and where synthetic data limits those tests. We state what human reviewers decide and the limits of our claims. Qualified evaluators can review detailed technical materials once confidentiality terms and legal review are in place.
What a qualified evaluation includes
- A documented data scope and review protocol.
- Performance measured against an agreed reference standard.
- False-positive and missed-finding analysis.
- Human-review workload and escalation outcomes.
- Known limitations and unresolved data-quality gaps.
What WardTrace does not establish
- Medical necessity. WardTrace reviews whether supplied records agree. It does not decide whether care was clinically warranted.
- Clinical accuracy. WardTrace does not determine whether a measurement or chart statement is medically correct.
- Fraud. A finding routes evidence to a human. It is not an automatic accusation or denial.
Detailed technical materials are shared with qualified evaluators under appropriate confidentiality and legal review.