Investor briefing · plain English

We are testing a durable claim-review record.

The category thesis is a hypothesis: a cited review record may help a qualified reviewer act on supplied-record disagreements more clearly than a score alone. The prototype has only synthetic evaluation today.

See the product work

The category opening

A score raises concern. A review record shows its cited basis.

Scores arrive late.

Often after payment, when the problem has become a slower dispute and remediation process.

Scores cannot explain themselves.

A number is easy to dispute when it cannot cite the exact records that conflict.

Scores may leave context scattered.

A reviewer may still need a durable record of what was supplied, what disagreed, and what limits applied.

The wedge

Start where the buyer’s risk is existential and the data already exists.

Remote Patient Monitoring vendors already hold the claim and supporting records needed for a governed review. That makes a calibration pilot focused and self-contained.

Federal auditors found that 43% of Medicare RPM enrollees were missing at least one required component. A vendor facing an audit may face significant operational review work.

Business model

Pricing and packaging remain unvalidated.

A flat per-device subscription is one planning hypothesis. No price, verification term, customer demand, or unit-economic claim has been validated through a field deployment.

Candidate model

Flat

Per-device pricing is a hypothesis to test with pilot buyers.

Alignment goal

Review

Packaging should avoid incentives to over-flag and preserve human decision authority.

Defensibility

The artifact becomes the standard.

An incumbent built around opaque scores would have to rebuild around a durable review artifact and move intervention earlier in the workflow. Defensibility, adoption, and intellectual-property posture remain to be validated.

Builtworking prototype
Measuredsynthetic validation
Nextfield calibration and legal review
Why now

AI makes plausible records cheap. Traceable review may become more valuable.

Documentation changed.

Cloned notes, fabricated media, and synthetic records are easier to produce.

Regulatory pressure is visible.

The RPM completeness finding is public, and vendors face review and documentation pressure.

The category is a hypothesis.

WardTrace is testing whether a review record can complement existing scoring and audit workflows.

Straight talk

Built and measured. Not yet field-calibrated.

The engine is measured on a fully synthetic corpus with by-construction ground truth. It is not yet running on a payer’s live production data, so synthetic results are not field performance. A governed calibration pilot is the next evidence point.

ENGINE · RUNNINGSYNTHETIC MEASUREMENT · COMPLETEFIELD CALIBRATION · NEXTREVENUE · PRE-LAUNCH

Book a 20-minute walkthrough