What a reviewer gets.
A clear, durable record of what was supplied, what disagreed, and what still needs judgment.
A record that lasts
Billing disputes often start with a missing record or one pieced together later. WardTrace keeps the key evidence in one place so a reviewer can check it.
Disagreements, cited
WardTrace is rules-based, not a black-box AI. Each finding points to the evidence a person should examine, and a second reviewer sees the same result.
A result a person can review
Each reviewed claim can produce aClaim Passport containing the claim summary, cited findings, method and limits, and integrity evidence. Later changes to included content can be detected. This does not authenticate a source record, establish completeness, or prove that an event occurred.
Why evidence and not a score
A score asks a reviewer to trust a number. WardTrace instead presents a specific, sourced disagreement and preserves the context needed for a human decision. It does not automatically deny claims or declare that fraud occurred.
The honest limits remain part of the record: WardTrace does not judge medical necessity or the clinical accuracy of source records. Current validation uses synthetic ground truth. Field performance requires a calibration pilot on the customer's own data.